Archive

Archive for the ‘Church History’ Category

Luther Puts a Nail in the Heart of Bad Religion – And 3 Other Holidays

October 31, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

(This blog by Justin Holcomb, the Academic Dean of Re:Train, was originally written and posted at Resurgence)

heart_death

Why did Martin Luther nail his famous 95 Theses to the Wittenberg church door on October 31, 1517?  He was confronting two religious observances that promoted false saintliness and exploited people’s fear of judgment and purgatory.  There’s a curious connection between Halloween and Reformation Day, and it’s more than just proximity on the calendar.

Halloween – Halloween (October 31) is celebrated by millions each year with costumes and candy.  Halloween’s deepest roots are decidedly pagan, despite its Christianized name.  Its origin is Celtic and has to do with summer sacrifices to appease Samhain, the lord of death, and evil spirits.  Those doing the pagan rituals believed that Samhain sent evil spirits abroad to attack humans, who could escape only by assuming disguises and looking like evil spirits themselves.  Christians tried to confront these pagan rites by offering a Christian alternative (All Hallows’ Day) that celebrated the lives of faithful Christian saints on November 1.  In medieval England the festival was known as All Hallows, hence the name Halloween (All Hallows’ eve) for the preceding evening.

All Saints’ Day – All Hallows’ Day or All Saints’ Day (November 1) was first celebrated on May 13, 609, when Pope Boniface IV dedicated the Pantheon in Rome to the Virgin Mary.  The date was later changed to November 1 by Pope Gregory III, who dedicated a chapel in honor of all saints in the Vatican Basilica. In 837, Pope Gregory IV (827-844) ordered its church-wide observance.  Its origin lies earlier in the common commemorations of Christian martyrs.  Over time these celebrations came to include not only the martyrs, but all saints.  During the Reformation the Protestant churches came to understand “saints” in its New Testament usage as including all believers and reinterpreted the feast of All Saints as a celebration of the unity of the entire Church.

All Souls’ Day – All Souls’ Day or the Day of the Dead is normally celebrated, primarily by Roman Catholics, on November 2.  This is a day dedicated to prayer and almsgiving in memory of ancestors who have died. People pray for the souls of the dead, in an effort to hasten their transition from purgatory to heaven by being purged and cleansed from their sins.

Reformation Day – Reformation Day (October 31) commemorates Luther’s posting of his 95 Theses on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany on October 31, 1517.  This act triggered the Reformation, as they were immediately translated and distributed across Germany in a matter of weeks.  The Protestant Reformation was the rediscovery of the doctrine of justification—salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone—and the protest against the corruption within the Roman Catholic Church.  The century before the Reformation was marked by widespread dismay with the venality of the leaders in the Roman Catholic Church and with its false doctrines, biblical illiteracy, superstition, and corruption.  Monks, priests, bishops, and popes in Rome taught unbiblical doctrines like the selling of indulgences, the treasury of merit, purgatory, and salvation through good works.

Treasury of Merit – Spiritually earnest people were told to justify themselves by charitable works, pilgrimages, and all kinds of religious performances and devotions.  They were encouraged to acquire this “merit,” which was at the disposal of the church, by purchasing certificates of indulgence.  This left them wondering if they had done or paid enough to appease God’s righteous anger and escape his judgment.  This was the context that prompted Luther’s desire to refocus the church on salvation by grace through faith on account of Christ by imputation of Christ’s righteousness to us.  To those spiritually oppressed by indulgences and not given assurance of God’s grace, Luther proclaimed free grace to God’s true saints:

God receives none but those who are forsaken, restores health to none but those who are sick, gives sight to none but the blind, and life to none but the dead. He does not give saintliness to any but sinners, nor wisdom to any but fools. In short: He has mercy on none but the wretched and gives grace to none but those who are in disgrace. Therefore no arrogant saint, or just or wise man can be material for God, neither can he do the work of God, but he remains confined within his own work and makes of himself a fictitious, ostensible, false, and deceitful saint, that is, a hypocrite (Luther W.A. 1.183ff).

Instead of the treasury of merit that was for sale, Luther protested, “The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God” (Thesis 62).  In celebration of Reformation Day, you should seriously read all 95 theses—they’re really good.

Which Came First: the Bible or the Church?

October 29, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

Which came first: the Bible or the Church?  Another way to ask this is, did the Church create the Bible or did the Bible create the Church?  I believe the following verses help us see the answer and why this is a really important question:

John 14:26, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.”

John 15:26-27, “When the Helper comes, whom I send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify about Me, and you will testify also, because you have been with Me from the beginning.”

John 16:13, “But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you (apostles) into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.”

John 17:20-21, “I do not ask on behalf of these alone, but for those also who believe in Me through their (the apostles, including Paul, the last apostle) word; that they may all be one; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me.”

What do these teach us about our question?  The Holy Spirit will be sent to the apostles, from the Father, in the name of Jesus.  Next, the Holy Spirit will bear witness to, testify, and cause the apostles to remember the Words of Jesus.  The Spirit will also lead the apostles into all truth and declare to them the things that are to come.  Then as a result of the testimony of the Holy Spirit, the apostles will testify and proclaim about Jesus (PREACHING).  Jesus then, prays for us, asking specifically that through the words of the apostles (PREACHING) we who believe may be one, as the Father and Jesus are one.  SO THAT the world would believe Jesus came from the Father.  Did you follow that?

Why does that matter and how does that answer our question?

We learn from this that the Spirit who is going to inspire the apostles with truth, specifically “all truth”, only speaks what He hears from Jesus and from the Father.  So, in turn when the apostles go out to preach, teach, and write letters to all the churches, those writings are God’s Words, because they are being inspired by the Spirit, and Spirit only speaks what He hears.  Thus, the apostles preaching and writing should not be thought of as their own, but rather as God’s Words through the power of the Spirit, about Jesus!  This is why the apostles oral and written words have power, and why they are the New Testament Canon.  Their Words, have the same authority as the Words of Jesus, because their Words are God’s Words, through the power of the Spirit!

So, Christians today have believed through the Words of the apostles, spoken and written.  And since we cannot hear them orally now, we read their words.  This New Testament canon, which because is being powered by the Spirit, is authoritative!  This brings to light the correct interpretation of Matthew 16:18 doesn’t it?  “I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.”   Is it Peter who is the rock?  No.  The Rock Jesus is referring to are the Words (Scripture) that will come from Peter and the rest of the apostles.  That is the foundation of the Church!  Therefore, the Church did not create the Bible at some point in time.   The Bible, the spoken Words of the Spirit empowered apostles created the Church.  It is this Scripture that Jesus will use to build His church.  Not popes, or rulers, or councils, but the Word of God!

Can you see now why Martin Luther and the rest of the reformers felt as if they must act?  They saw this, and tried as hard as they could to restore the Rock to its rightful place, above all men!

Christ is not only Himself the canon in which God comes to the world, and in which He hallows Himself before the world, but Christ also establishes the canon and gives it a concrete historical form. Christ establishes the canon first of all in His own word and work but then also in transfer of authority (exousia) to His authorized representatives, in the Holy Spirit witnessing with them and through them, and in the apostolic tradition. And Christ is also the canon because He establishes and maintains the bond between that canon and the church. It is this rock (petra) on which He builds His church…Christ establishes the canon in the ascertainable character of apostolic preaching and in the legibility of apostolic writings, in the preservation of the apostolic witness and doctrine…On that word and according to that canon, Christ will establish and build His church by causing the church to accept just this canon and, by means of the assistance and witness of the Holy Spirit, to recognize it as His…The canon of Christ will persist because there will continue to be a church of Christ, and the church of Christ will persist because the canon of Christ will continue to exist and because Christ through His Spirit will build His church on that canon.

(Herman Ridderbos, Redemptive History and the New Testament Scriptures, pages 37-38)

Categories: Church History

Way To Go Honorius!

April 30, 2009 A. W. Powers 2 comments

Today (April 30) in 418 AD Roman Emperor Honorius (who ruled 395-423) issued a decree denouncing Pelagianism, which taught that humanity can take the initial and fundamental steps toward salvation by its own efforts, apart from divine grace.

Isn’t it interesting that what most Christians champion as theologically correct presently is exactly what the early Church fathers condemned as heresy.  This is why Church History is important for us to know, because we don’t want to champion anything that has been condemned as heresy in the past.  That is, unless it is true.  But take heart!  Pelagianism, is not Biblical.

Do You Feel It?

April 23, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

If you think that David Brainerd was the only one who felt “filled with a kind of pleasing pain” your wrong.  Francis Asbury, wrote this in his journal on April 22, 1776:

‘I found Christ in me the hope of glory; but felt a pleasing, painful sensation of spiritual hunger and thirst for more of God.’

Do you feel it?  I am praying you are.

Happy Birthday David!

April 20, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

Today, April 20th, in 1718 David Brainerd was born.  In his diary David wrote these words on his 25th birthday

Set apart this day for fasting and prayer, to bow my soul before God for the bestowement of divine grace; especially that all my spiritual afflictions and inward distresses might be sanctified to my soul.  And endeavored also to remember the goodness of God to me the year past, this day being my birthday.  Having obtained help of God, I have hitherto lived and am now arrived at the age of twenty-five years.  My soul was pained to think of my barrenness and deadness; that I  have lived so little to the glory of the eternal God.  I spent the day in the woods alone, and there poured out my complaint to God.  Oh, that God would enable me to live to His glory for the future!

brainerd

“Eloi, Eloi,lama sabacthani?”

April 11, 2009 A. W. Powers 3 comments

On Good Friday (yesterday) Jesus was executed by being nailed to a cross.  During His time on the cross Jesus only said 7 things.

1) “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” (Luke 23:34)

2) “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:43)

3) “Dear woman, here is your son”, and to the disciple, “here is your mother.” (John 19:26-27)

4) “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” (Mark 15:34)

5) “I am thirsty.” (John 19: 28)

6) “It is finished.” (John 19:30)

7) “Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit.” (Luke 23:46)

All of these demand exposition, but I want to draw your attention to #4.  Here is the whole verse, “And at the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice and said, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” – which means, “My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34)  Have you ever wondered why Jesus said that?  Was Jesus merely interpreting his current circumstances according to God’s Word because this is a quote from Psalm 22?  No, it was more.  What then?  It was fulfillment!  Psalm 22:1 was originally written by David.  David must have been going through a rough time to say this to God.  All hope must have been lost.  But we need to notice that David did not really experience being forsaken by God.  He was just feeling extreme despair at the moment of writing this.  So why is this recorded in Scripture?

This verse is present in Psalm 22 and on Jesus’ lips because it points forward to something greater.  I say this meaning that it points forward to the One who would truthfully experience being forsaken by God, Jesus.  This was not true for David, God promised him very much (2 Samuel 7).  This is not true for us either, God promised to always be with us (Matthew 28:20).  This was true for Jesus.  The One who had never before experienced seperation from God, Jesus, for the first time experienced being forsaken by God.  Why?  Two main reasons: 1) That we might become the righteousness of God through Him (2 Cor. 5:21).  And 2) So that the Gentiles might glorify God because of His mercy (Romans 15:8-9).

Categories: Church History, The Cross

64 Years Ago Today

John Piper wrote this today on the Desiring God blog:

Today, sixty-four years ago, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was hanged for his part in the conspiracy to assassinate Adolf Hitler. He is known by many for one main sentence. It is worthy of Holy Week. Here is the context of his most famous quote:

“The cross is laid on every Christian. The first Christ-suffering which every man must experience is the call to abandon the attachments of this world. It is that dying of the old man which is the result of his encounter with Christ. As we embark upon discipleship we surrender ourselves to Christ in union with his death—we give over our lives to death. Thus it begins; the cross is not the terrible end to an otherwise god-fearing and happy life, but it meets us at the beginning of our communion with Christ. When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die. It may be a death like that of the first disciples who had to leave home and work to follow him, or it may be a death like Luther’s, who had to leave the monastery and go out into the world. But it is the same death every time—death in Jesus Christ, the death of the old man at his call.” (The Cost of Discipleship, 99)

This Day in 1507

Do you feel like your life does not matter?  Do you feel like God is not using you?  Do you feel like God’s plan for you has gone astray?  It has’nt.  Keep turning to the Bible and continue seeking Him, you’ll see that everything fits into place.  Want proof?  On April 4, 1507 a young 21 year old man named Martin Luther was ordained as a priest in the Roman Catholic Church.  Little did anyone (but God!) know what would happen when this man was unleashed into the treasures of God’s Word.  I wonder what would happen if you were so gripped by God’s Word?saint-martin-luther3

Was the American Revolution Sinful?

March 13, 2009 A. W. Powers 13 comments

british-grenadierHere are the facts:

In 1763 the French stopped attacking the American Colonies.  The British rulers imposed new taxes on the Colonies to show their authority and power over them.  The Colonies saw these as illegitimate because they had little American representation in British government; therefore they had no choice in the matter.  In response to these taxes and some trade regulations on the Colonies, the Americans formed their own Provincial Congress in each Colony.  In 1774 these Provincial Congress’s became united in their rejection of the British taxes and created the first Continental Congress.  In response to this rejection Britain sent combat troops to Boston and the fighting began in 1775.  After another year, the Continental Congress wrote up what they called, the Declaration of Independence, which rejected the British Monarchy and its parliament.  In 1778 America allied with France, and Britain slowly lost control of the Colonies after large battles in Saratoga (1777) and Yorktown (1781).  The Treaty of Paris was signed in 1783, which ended the fighting and all British rule over the Colonies.  America was free, just as they wanted.

Now to my question; was this revolution sinful?  Why even ask this question?  Romans 13 brings it into view.  Paul says in Romans 13:1-5 “Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.  Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.  For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil.  Do you want to have no fear of authority?  Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good.  But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.  Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake.”

Paul’s point is hard but clear.  We ought to submit to the governing authorities because in doing so we are submitting to God.  Paul’s point becomes especially clear when you realize that he is writing during Emperor Nero’s rule.  How does this make Paul’s point clearer?  Nero persecuted the Church more than any ruler to this present day.  He would often sew up Christians inside animal skins and let lions loose on them, to be eaten alive.  He would also dip Christians in oil, tie them to poles in his garden, and light them on fire to light his garden during the night.  Yet Paul says, submit to Nero.

We must keep in mind that there is a time not to obey the government.  This is only to happen when the government tells us to stop doing something God has commanded (see here).  (But we should also notice that when we do not obey the government, we do not take up arms!  We continue obeying God, and if necessary, lay down our lives for doing so.  Never are we to take up arms against the government because we cannot do this or that.)  Was this the case with the Revoltuionary War?  Yes.  They wanted to get out from under the British rule and taxes, and fought because of it.  So was this War sinful?  Yes.  Praise God that He uses our sin for the good right? (Genesis 50:20)

I know that some (maybe most) will view me as being unpatriotic because of this; but shall we honor country above God and His Word?  No.  I am not anti-American, I do enjoy living here.  I will submit to the government in everything as Romans 13 calls me, and every other person to do.  But I will not submit to anything this country commands that God has forbid in His Word.  What is my aim in telling you these things?  I simply want you to view history more through God’s Word than through patriotism.  What does this mean about celebrating July 4th?  Am I celebrating a sinful act?  Yes and no.  Yes because the War was sinful.  No because we are celebrating God’s goodness to us in spite of our sin (He has blessed our nation in spite of our sin).  We remember that God has given us ultimate freedom, not from man’s rule and man’s taxes; but by the blood of His Son, Jesus Christ.  I pray that you would also join me in the submission we are called to in Romans 13.

Categories: Church History, Romans

On Calvin

(Guest Post: Mike Clark)

John Calvin was born on July 10, 1509 in the farm country of Noyon, France, some sixty miles northeast of Paris. His French name was Jean Cauvin. His parents were Gerard and Jeanne Cauvin. The couple had three or four other children, all boys. Their names were Charles, the eldest, Antoine, and Francois who died young, and perhaps an earlier Antoine who also died in infancy. At the time of his birth, Martin Luther was twenty six years old and had just commenced his teaching ministry at the University of Wittenberg. Eight years later, in the year 1517, Luther posted his Ninety-Five Theses on the door of the Church at Wittenberg. The world was ripe for reformation.

His Life
We know very little of his early home life. Calvin gives only glimpses of his childhood in which he would attend religious treats and feasts and the pilgrimage with his mother to Ourscamp Abbey, where he was allowed to kiss a holy relic. His mother died in the year 1515 and his father soon remarried and had two daughters with his second wife. His father was a financial administrator for the Catholic Bishop of the Noyon diocese and raised John to enter the priesthood in the Roman Catholic Church. When John was eleven years of age, Gerard gained a chaplaincy for his son at the Noyon Cathedral. When he was fourteen, he entered the University of Paris to study theology in formal preparation to become a priest. At the age of seventeen, he earned a Master of Arts degree. With this he had a solid grounding in the basics of a classical education, including philosophy, logic, and the Latin language. When Calvin was nineteen, a conflict arose between his father and the bishop of Noyon, which prompted Gerard to move his son out of the study of theology and into the study of law. Calvin studied law at the University of Bourges for the next three years. During this time he learned Greek, analytical thinking, and persuasive argument, which would benefit him so greatly when it came time to be used in the Genevan pulpit. Calvin was known to be able to argue his point so convincingly that he would later be nicknamed “the accusative case.”
Calvin’s father, Gerard, died in May of 1531 when Calvin was twenty-one. Having become freed from his father’s dominant influence, he moved back to Paris and pursued his first love, the study of literature, or more specifically, the classics. He would later return to Bourges and complete his legal studies and was awarded his doctor of laws degree in 1532. In that same year, Calvin published his first book, a Commentary on Seneca, at the age of twenty-three. This book was his doctoral dissertation and revealed his ability to break down language and grasp the intentions of an author. This is exactly what Calvin would later do with the Scriptures both in his preaching and his writing. He gave the God-intended meaning by explaining the message of the biblical writers.
During these years, Calvin was coming into contact with the message and spirit of the Reformation. In 1533 something dramatic would happen in his life. Steve Lawson writes “Upon being introduced to the gospel, a growing restlessness with his way of life came upon him, and a deepening conviction of his sin drove him to seek relief in the grace and mercy of God. Calvin later described his encounter with Christ and its immediate effects saying that God by a sudden conversion subdued and brought my mind to a teachable frame, which was more hardened in such matters than might have been expected from one at my early period of life. Having thus received some taste and knowledge of true godliness, I was immediately inflamed with so intense a desire to make progress therein, that although I did not altogether leave off other studies, yet I pursued them with less ardour.” John Piper speaking of Calvin’s conversion remarks “Calvin suddenly saw and tasted in Scripture the majesty of God. And in that moment, both God and the Word of God were so powerfully and unquestionably authenticated to his soul that he became the loving servant of God and his Word the rest of his life.”
After Calvin’s conversion, he abandoned the Roman Catholic Church and joined the Protestant cause. He soon met opposition however for his new found faith in Christ. In 1533, Nicholas Cop, a friend of Calvin’s and rector of the University of Paris, preached the opening address of the winter term at the university. It was a plea for a reformation based on the New Testament and it was a bold attack against the scholastic theologians of the day. Cop encountered strong resistance for this. It was believed that Calvin wrote the speech for Cop and was forced to flee Paris in the middle of the night being let down from a window by sheets and disguising himself as a vinedresser. This was a sign of things to come for Calvin.
Calvin was imprisoned for a short time and fled to the estate of Louis du Tillet who was sympathetic to the cause of the Reformation. Here Calvin had the opportunity to spend five months reading books from du Tillet’s extensive theological library. He read the Bible, along with many of the writings of the church fathers, among them Augustine. Calvin worked hard during this time and by the grace of God was becoming quite the theologian.
In 1534 he traveled to Basel, Switzerland and began writing his most famous “Institutes of the Christian Religion.” Lawson again comments “Calvin’s institutes would become the defining masterpiece of Protestant theology, the single most important book to be written during the Reformation. It would take its place ahead of even Luther’s most revered work, “The Bondage of the Will.” During the next twenty-three years, the Institutes would undergo five major expansions until reaching its present form in 1559. Addressed to King Francis I of France, this work explained the true nature of biblical Christianity. Calvin hoped the book would ease the persecution that was being brought against Protestants by the Roman Catholic Church in France. It was a theological tour de force, presenting a compelling argument for core Reformed teachings, and its publication instantly thrust Calvin into a recognized leadership role among the Reformers.”
When a temporary amnesty was granted to French exiles, Calvin returned to France. He then began a journey to Strasbourg with the intention of studying and writing in seclusion and tranquility. On his way to Strasbourg, God in His providence redirected Calvin. On the way, Calvin was forced to detour through Geneva, Switzerland because of a war between Charles V, the emperor, and Francis I which resulted in troop movements that blocked the road to Strasbourg. Calvin only intended to spend one night in Geneva, but while there was recognized by William Farel, the Protestant leader in the newly Reformed city. Farel met with Calvin and this meeting proved to be one of history’s most pivotal encounters for the church in Geneva. Lawson again tells of this encounter between these two giants of the Christian faith from Calvin’s perspective: “Farel, who burned with an extraordinary zeal to advance the gospel, immediately strained every nerve to detain me. And after having learned that my heart was set upon devoting myself to private studies, for which I wished to keep myself free from other pursuits, and finding that he gained nothing by entreaties, he proceeded to utter an imprecation that God would curse my retirement, and the tranquility of the studies which I sought, if I should withdraw and refuse to give assistance, when the necessity was so urgent. By this imprecation I was so stricken with terror that I desisted from the journey which I had undertaken.” The young Calvin in response to Farel’s challenge agreed to stay, recognizing that this was the direction of God for his life. Instead of spending time in Strasbourg studying, Calvin was now thrust into the visible spotlight of Geneva with its abundance of demands. He was then appointed professor of sacred Scripture in Geneva and four months later became the pastor of Saint Pierre Cathedral.
Calvin and Farel both began to work on reforming the church in Geneva. They drew up a confession of faith and sought to bring the lives of the ten thousand citizens of the city into conformity with the Scriptures. They met strong opposition. One opposition was when they attempted to fence the Lord’s Table by excommunicating anyone living in open sin. For this they were banished from the city in 1538. Again Calvin went into exile to Strasbourg for three years. There Calvin pastured a Protestant congregation of some five hundred French speaking refugees. He also taught the New Testament in the local theological institute, wrote his first commentary on the book of Romans, and published the second edition of the Institutes. During these years, there was a member of his congregation in Strasbourg whom he took as his wife. Her name was Idelette Stordeur. She was an Anabaptist widow and had a son and daughter from her first marriage. They were married in 1540. Their union brought a lot of heartache to both of their souls. Idelette miscarried once, lost a daughter at birth, and had a son die at two weeks of age. Amazingly Calvin spoke in a God glorifying manner of his son, saying “The Lord has certainly inflicted a bitter wound in the death of our infant son, but He is Himself a father and knows what is good for His children.” If this were not enough, Idelette died in 1549 at the age of 40 from tuberculosis. Calvin never remarried and it is just as well, for the pace he kept would not have left much time for wife and children. For the rest of his life, he devoted himself wholly to the work of the Lord.
The City of Geneva soon found itself in many struggles and was willing to call for Calvin to return as the city’s pastor. After hesitating for ten months, he accepted reluctantly. Calvin returned to Geneva on September 13, 1541 where he would stay until his death. Calvin immediately began preaching in the town in addition to resuming his pulpit preaching picking back up precisely where he had left off three years earlier in the very next verse. Calvin started preaching multiple times on Sunday and also during the week. Geneva was becoming a shining beacon of truth from his verse-by-verse exposition of Scripture, week after week and day after day. During this time many people were pouring into the city. They included the Huguenots, Protestants from Scotland and England seeking refuge from “Bloody Mary”, and others from Germany and Italy. The city doubled its size to twenty thousand. Among these refugees from Scotland was John Knox, who said that Calvin’s church was the most perfect school of Christ that ever was in the earth since the days of the Apostles. Knox later became the leader of the Reformation in Scotland. During his time in Geneva, Knox was part of a group who sat under Calvin’s expositions and helped translate the Geneva Bible which contained the first theological notes printed in the margin. This Geneva Bible was the Bible which was predominant among English Puritans for the next one hundred years. The Pilgrims brought the Geneva Bible with them on the Mayflower when they came to America and it was the Bible of choice among the early colonists.
During this time, a man by the name of Denis Raguenier began writing down Calvin’s sermons by the means of a private system of shorthand. He was eventually employed to produce a transcript of each one-hour sermon, consisting on average of six thousand words. These expositions were translated into different languages and gained a wide distribution. Scotland and England became beneficiaries of Calvin’s written sermons. The Synod of Dort in Holland and the Westminster Assembly in England, which ended up drafting the Westminster Confessions and Catechisms, became indirect outgrowths of Calvin’s preaching. Many of Calvin’s sermons remain in print to this present day.
The years in Geneva for Calvin were far from being trouble free. Calvin was frail in stature and suffered many ailments. In one way Calvin tried to keep himself healthy, but his way of doing this probably caused more harm than good. In another way, he took little regard to his health. For years he would be content with a single meal a day and never taking anything between two meals. He did this because he had found out by experience that the weakness of his stomach and his migraines could only be controlled by continual abstinence. His working night and day with little breaks certainly added to his ill health. You can see his ferocious drive to work when he said “Apart from the sermons and the lectures, there is a month gone by in which I have scarce done anything, in such wise I am almost ashamed to live thus useless.” He had preached a mere twenty sermons and twelve lectures in that month alone! On top of his physical suffering, he encountered numerous threats to his life. He was most familiar with the sound of mobs outside his home in Geneva threatening to throw him in the river and firing their muskets. He had lived amid continual bickering and at times had before the door of his house some forty or fifty shots from a large gun. One group that caused him much grief was the Libertines, who boasted in their licentious living. They claimed that their sexual immorality was permissible arguing that the “communion of the saints” meant that their bodies should be joined to the wives of others. One day a prominent Libertine, Philibert Berthelier, was forbidden to partake of the Lord’s Supper because of his known sexual promiscuity. Berthelier and his associates came to church to partake of the Lord’s Supper with their swords drawn, ready to fight. With great boldness, Calvin stepped down from the pulpit, stood in front of the Communion Table, and said “These hands you may crush, these arms you may lop off, my life you may take, my blood is yours, you may shed it; but you shall never force me to give holy things to the profaned and dishonor the table of my God.” Under conviction, Berthelier and his Libertines withdrew.
Calvin’s health later in life continued to decline. No sooner had Calvin recovered from the quartan fever during 1558-1559, that he then aggravated his already existing trouble with his lungs. He overstrained his voice preaching and brought on a violent cough that broke a blood-vessel in his lungs and had a bad hemorrhage. He suffered great pain from kidney stones and hemorrhoids and was weakened more and more from pulmonary tuberculosis. An ulcer in the hemorrhoid veins sometimes even prevented Calvin from being able to sit or lie in bed without severe pain. He had severe and acute pains in his calves which eventually turned into a disease of the joints, which spread to his feet and knees. He suffered attacks of gout and nephritis and not being able to endure the jolting of horseback, had to be carried into the country in a litter. One day while trying to walk home, he had almost gone a mile when he was forced with the strong desire to urinate. To his surprise, blood flowed instead of urine and once he was home ejected a stone so big that it tore the urinary canal and the flow of blood could only be arrested by an injection of woman’s milk through a syringe.
As Calvin approached the end of his life, he faced death with great resolution just as he had in the pulpit. Lawson writes of Calvin’s last will and testament which he dictated on April 25, 1564: “In the name of God, I, John Calvin, servant of the Word of God in the church of Geneva, thank God that He has shown not only mercy toward me, His poor creature, and has suffered me in all my sins and weaknesses, but what is much more, that He has made me a partaker of His grace to serve Him through my work. I confess to live and die in this faith which He has given me, inasmuch as I have no other hope or refuge than His predestination upon which my entire salvation is grounded. I embrace the grace which He has offered me in our Lord Jesus Christ and accept the merits of His suffering and dying, that through them all my sins are buried; and I humbly beg Him to wash me and cleanse me with the blood of our great Redeemer, so that I, when I shall appear before His face may bear His likeness. Moreover, I declare that I endeavored to teach His Word undefiled and to expound Holy Scripture faithfully, according to the measure of grace which He has given me.”
In Calvin’s final days, his breathing became more and more difficult with each breathe. For a few more days, he lingered in distress and pain, still trying to work, repeating verses from the Psalms. He was in complete control of his mind until the end. On the evening of May 27, 1564 John Calvin breathed his last at the age of 54 in the arms of Theodore Beza, his successor. Calvin’s last words were “How long, O Lord?” He died literally quoting the Bible he preached and was faithful to the end.
For Calvin, the fundamental issue from the beginning to the end of his life was the issue of the centrality and supremacy and majesty of the glory of God. Piper observes “The essential meaning of John Calvin’s life and preaching is that he recovered and embodied a passion for the absolute reality and majesty of God. That is what I want us to see most clearly.” Benjamin Warfield said of Calvin “No man ever had a profounder sense of God than he.” Piper quotes Geerhardus Vos, the Princeton New Testament scholar, when asked in 1891 why has Reformed theology been able to grasp the fullness of Scripture unlike any other branch of Christendom, he replies “Because Reformed theology took hold of the Scriptures in the deepest root idea. This root idea which served as the key to unlock the rich treasuries of the Scriptures was the preeminence of God’s glory in the consideration of all that has been created.” Piper continues “It is this relentless orientation on the glory of God that gives coherence to John Calvin’s life and to the Reformed tradition that followed. Vos said that the all-embracing slogan of the Reformed faith is this: the work of grace in the sinner is a mirror for the glory of God. Mirroring the glory of God is the meaning of John Calvin’s life and ministry.”
Calvin’s commitment to the majesty of God produced a ministry of incredible steadfastness and of invincible constancy. It was a ministry of unrelenting exposition of the Word of God. Calvin had seen the majesty of God in the Scriptures. Calvin’s writings consisted of tracts, the Institutes, commentaries on every book in the New Testament with the exception of Revelation, and many Old Testament commentaries including the Pentateuch, Psalms, Isaiah, and Jeremiah. He preached ten sermons every two weeks and gave many biblical lectures. He preached steadily through book after book of the Bible. He never wavered from this approach to preaching for his twenty-five years in Geneva. His only exception was for certain festivals or special occasions. On Sunday he would preach from the New Testament and on Sunday afternoons would teach on the Psalms. The Old Testament was preached on during the week. Piper, speaking of Calvin’s preaching states “To give you some idea of the scope of Calvin’s pulpit, he began on the book of Acts on August 25, 1549, and ended it in March 1554. After Acts he went on to the epistles to the Thessalonians (forty-six sermons), Corinthians (186 sermons), the pastoral epistles (eighty-six sermons), Galatians (forty-three sermons), Ephesians (forty-eight sermons) until May 1558. Then there is a gap when he was ill. In the spring of 1559, he began the Harmony of the Gospels and was not finished when he died in May 1564. On the weekdays during that season he preached 159 sermons on Job, 200 on Deuteronomy, 353 on Isaiah, 123 on Genesis, and so on.”
Calvin had a remarkable commitment to the centrality of sequential expository preaching for several reason and they are reasons that are just as relevant today as they were in Calvin’s time. First Calvin believed that the Word of God was a lamp that had been taken away from the churches and he believed the continuous exposition of books was the best way to overcome the abandonment of God’s Word. Secondly, Calvin was horrified of those who preached their own ideas in the pulpit. Expounding the Scriptures as a whole forced one to deal with the whole counsel of God and not just what one wanted to say. Lastly, Calvin believed that the Word of God was indeed the Word of God and that all of it was inspired and profitable and radiant with the light of the glory of God. Calvin thought “there would be no better way to manifest the full range of the glories of God and the majesty of his being than to spread out the full range of God’s Word in the context of the pastoral ministry of shepherding care.”
Today the evangelical church is in a critical hour of redemptive history. There is a great need now as there was in Calvin’s day of expository preaching. The church must capture the centrality and pungency of biblical preaching once again. There must be a return to preaching that is Word-driven, God-exalting, Christ-centered, and Spirit-empowered. We need new generations of expositors of the Word of God. We need those who will preach the Word in season and out of season. Calvin is truly one to emulate as Paul instructed Timothy to emulate him. It is my prayer that having learned more about this great Reformer that I would be just as faithful in my own ministry to expositional preaching as Calvin was. He is an inspiration to all believers to live for the glory of God and was a great gift that our Lord Jesus Christ gave to His church.

Bibliography
Dillenberger, John. John Calvin, Selections from His Writings. Atlanta: Scholar Press, 1975.

Latourette, Kenneth S. A History of Christianity Volume II “Reformation to the Present.” New York: Harper Collins, 1953.

Lawson, Steven J. The Expository Genius of John Calvin. Lake Mary: Reformation Trust, 2007.

Parker, T.H.L. John Calvin: A Biography. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2006.

Piper, John. The Legacy of Sovereign Joy. Wheaton: Crossway, 2000.

Warfield, Benjamin. Calvin and Augustine. Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1971.

Wileman, William. John Calvin, His Life, His Teaching, and His Influence. Chotearu, MT: Old Paths Gospel Press, 1981.

On Bunyan

March 2, 2009 A. W. Powers 2 comments

(Guest Post: Mike Clark)

John Bunyan was born on November 30, 1628 in Elstow, about a mile south of Bedford, England to the parents of Thomas Bunyan and Margaret Bentley. His father Thomas was a tinker or metal worker and he and his wife Margaret were both natives of Elstow and were born in the same year of 1603. Margaret had known Thomas all her life. However, Thomas was first married to Anne Pinney in 1623, but she died a few years later in 1627 childless. That same year he remarried to Margaret in the month of May. We know very little about John’s father and even less about his mother. In late November of 1628 we see the simple beginnings of a great and strong life. John Brown comments “We seem to see the wondrous babe carried on that last of the chill days of November of 1628 to Elstow Church to be christened. Rude was the little cradle out of which he was lifted, and commonplace the cottage, with its grimy forge, out of which he was carried.” Such were the humble beginnings of a man that would be used by God greatly.
His Life
Growing up, John Bunyan received the ordinary education of the poor, which equated to being able to read and write and not much more than that. The real education that he received was that given in the great school of human life where many have received such effective training. He learned the trade of his father as the saying goes that the bread eaters must soon become the bread-winners.
The first of his many great sorrows came when he was sixteen years of age. In June of 1644, his mother and sister died within one month of each other. His sister, Margaret, the playmate of his childhood, was only thirteen. Within weeks of each other, John found himself walking across the fields to the quiet graves in the Elstow Churchyard. Before another month had gone by, his second great heartache came when his father remarried to fill the place of his mother. Old enough to understand and affectionate enough to resent, this indignity to his mother’s memory must have estranged him from his father and his home. Brown again writes “The removal of the gentler influence of mother and sister at the formative period of life, and the revulsion of feeling created by the indecent haste with which his father had married again, may have had not a little to do with the those wild and willful ways of the next few years, which he lived to describe so vividly and repent so bitterly.” About six to eight months after his mother’s death, Bunyan entered the Parliamentary Army. There he served for two years and experienced some harrowing moments such as when a man took his place as a sentinel and soon after was shot in the head with a musket ball and died. Another time, during a military operation, he fell into a creek of the sea and hardly escaped drowning. These memories came back to him when it came time to write about the fight between Apollyon, the expedition of Greatheart, and the winning back of Mansoul for Emmanuel.
After leaving the Army, Bunyan returned to Elstow and his tinkering. Soon after that, at the age of twenty or twenty one, he married a woman who was an orphan and a native of a place other than Elstow. This woman brought into Bunyan’s life a real home with the presence of love, something that had been absent since his mother’s death. They came together as poor and poor might be, not having so much household stuff as a dish or spoon between the both of them. Brown adds that “it was an unpromising beginning, but many that are more promising turn out worse. It may be that where there are health and hope and honest industry, mutual love and trust can better supply the lack of dish and spoon than an abundance of dishes and spoons can supply the lack of love.” John and his wife together had four children. They were Mary, Elizabeth, John, and Thomas. Mary, being the oldest, was born blind. This was a tremendous burden of his heart in caring for Mary and the others, but became greater when he was imprisoned. Bunyan’s wife had a godly father who had passed down to her two books which she brought to the marriage. One was entitled “The Plain Man’s Pathway to Heaven” which was a little square book of about four hundred pages having been first published around 1601, and in 1637 had reached its twenty-fourth edition. It is in the form of a dialogue between four persons, who appear as a divine, a plain honest man, and ignorant man, and a caviler. The other book, which Bunyan read with his wife, was called “The Practice of Piety.” Its distinctly ecclesiastical tone was a favorite with the Puritans. Bunyan found these books pleasing to read, but not convicting. God, however, had already started his work of drawing the young Bunyan to Himself.
During these days, Bunyan was not yet a Christian. The sinfulness of Bunyan’s early life was not specially those of the flesh. He was not a drunkard and he denied that he had ever been unchaste. It should be noted that a man’s weakness, however, is often the reaction from his strength. Brown describes Bunyan’s violent outrage against reverence and truth stating that “his burning power of expression ran riot in weird blasphemies which made even blasphemers tremble. This kind of wickedness that had begun early lasted long. He was a grown man, when one who was herself a loose and ungodly wretch, and therefore not over-nice, protested that it made her tremble to hear him and that he was the ungodliest fellow for swearing ever she heard in all her life, and that it was enough to spoil all the youth in the whole town.” In his autobiography, “Grace Abounding” he mentions that he had few equals for his cursing, swearing, lying, and blaspheming the holy name of God. He was the ringleader of all the youth that kept company with him in all manner of vice and ungodliness.
One day while playing a game of cat, he felt as if he heard a voice from heaven dart into his soul saying “wilt thou leave thy sins and go to heaven, or have thy sins and go to hell?” His conscience was stricken and made a desperate attempt to be rid of it. He then tried self reform and gave up swearing, took up reading the historical parts of the Bible, and set about to keep the commandments, which he thought he did nicely and that God would be well pleased with him as any other man in England. His neighbors noticed a change in him and expressed a sense of surprise which fed his pride and became proud of his godliness. The Lord, leading Bunyan in a way that he did not know, mercifully shook him out of his self-satisfaction. One day as he was going into Bedford to work he came across three or four poor women having a spiritual conversation. At this time, he himself had become quite the talker on the things of religion. Overhearing their discussion, he soon found that their talk was above him and spoke of a holy discontent with themselves and of a new birth from above. They spoke of how God had visited their souls with His love in the Lord Jesus which refreshed, comforted, and strengthened them. They spoke of the pleasantness of Scripture and grace and seemed to him that they had found a new world to which he was altogether a stranger. These women were members of a church whose pastor was John Gifford. Bunyan soon began attending services and he and his family became members in 1653.
For Bunyan, there were seasons of great doubt about the Scriptures and about his own soul. A whole flood of blasphemies poured on his spirit. From morning to night, he felt he was being carried away by a mighty whirlwind. During this time, Bunyan happened to pick up an old book that was falling apart and found in it his own condition so largely and profoundly handled as if it had been written out of his own heart. It was a copy of the “Commentary on the Galatians,” by Martin Luther. How fitting that the one man of all the centuries most fitted to walk with Bunyan was Luther. Bunyan said that he did prefer this book of Martin Luther, with the exception of the Bible, before all books that ever I have seen as most fit for a wounded conscience. At the same time, Bunyan had one temptation that loomed large in his experience. John Piper remarks “When he thought that he was established in the Gospel, there came a season of overwhelming darkness following a terrible temptation when he heard the words, ‘sell and part with this most blessed Christ….Let him go if he will.’ He tells us that ‘I felt my heart freely consent thereto. Oh, the diligence of Satan; oh, the desperateness of man’s heart.’ For two years, he tells us, he was in the doom of damnation. ‘I feared that this wicked sin of mine might be that sin unpardonable.’ ‘Oh, no one knows the terrors of those days but myself.’ I found it a hard work now to pray to God because despair was swallowing me up.” Then at last came the decisive day. Brown writing about that decisive day along with Bunyan’s thoughts says “One day as he was passing into the field, still with some fears in his heart, suddenly this sentence fell into his soul, “Thy righteousness is in heaven “; and methought withal I saw with the eye of my soul, Jesus Christ at God’s right hand. I saw moreover, that it was not my good frame of heart that made my righteousness better, nor yet my bad frame that made my righteousness worse; for my righteousness was Jesus Christ Himself, the same yesterday, today, and forever. Now did my chains fall from my legs indeed; I was loosed from my afflictions and irons. Now Christ was all; all my wisdom, all my righteousness, all my sanctification, and all my redemption!”
In 1655 after his conversion, members of his church asked him to exhort the church, to which he acquiesced. There he discovered his gifts among the people. Those fortunate first listeners did feel in their hearts that they had the privilege of having no common seer among them. His popularity as a powerful lay preacher grew. When the country understood that he, the tinker, had turned preacher, they came to hear the word by hundreds and that from all parts. Brown adds “In the days of toleration, a day’s notice would get a crowd of 1,200 to hear him preach at 7 o’clock in the morning on a weekday.” Piper, quoting Brown, further remarks concerning Bunyan “the greatest Puritan theologian, and a contemporary of Bunyan, John Owen, when asked by King Charles why he, a great scholar, went to hear an uneducated tinker preach, said, ‘I would willingly exchange my learning for the tinker’s power of touching men’s hearts.’” Preaching became Bunyan’s passion and became the work of his life. Bunyan once said, speaking of Christ’s condescension, “He became poorer than they that go with flail and rake. In Him death has no fear for us. Death can do no thee no harm. It is only a passage out of a prison into a palace.”
During this time there is an interesting story told of how Bunyan encountered a university man on the road near Cambridge. The university man asked him how he, not having the original scriptures, dared to preach. To this he replied by asking the man, in turn, if he himself had the originals, the actual copies written by the prophets and apostles. The man said no, but he had what he knew to be true copies of the originals. And I, Bunyan said, believe the English Bible to be a true copy also.
Bunyan pleaded with his fellow believers to pray for him. He asked them “pray for me to our God, with much earnestness, fervency, and frequently, in all your knockings at our Father’s door, because I do very much stand in need thereof, for my work is great, my heart is vile, the devil lieth at watch, the world would fain be saying, Aha, aha, thus would we have it! And of myself, keep myself I cannot, trust myself I dare not; if God does not help me I am sure it will not be long before my heart deceives, and the world have their advantage of me.”
In the days of Bunyan, there were great conflicts between Parliament and monarchy in England. Both Bishop William Laud and King Charles I opposed the reforms of the Church of England desired by the Puritans and pressed to bring all the Church of England into High Church conformity along the lines of the Book of Common Prayer. Bunyan speaking about the Book of Common Prayer said that he could pray very well without it. For a time the nonconformists had their way, but after a while Parliament turned against them and passed a series of acts that resulted in increased restrictions on the Puritan preachers. In 1662, the Act of Uniformity was passed that required acceptance, again, of the Book of Common Prayer and Episcopal ordination. Two thousand Puritan pastors were forced out of their churches. If caught preaching apart from the Church of England fines were imposed or arrests were made. One gentlemen, who was using his house as a place of worship, was fined a large amount and had many goods taken. He pleaded with the authorities saying “Sir what shall my children do? Shall they starve?” The authorities responded saying “so long as he was a rebel his children should starve.” In 1660, while Bunyan was preaching, the constables came and ordered him to go with him and thus the twelve year ordeal in prison began.
A few years before Bunyan went to prison, his wife died, leaving him with four children under ten. In 1659 he married Elizabeth, a remarkable woman. After only a year of marriage, Bunyan was arrested and put in prison while his wife was pregnant and miscarried during the crisis. Elizabeth cared for the four children as a stepmother for those twelve years of John’s imprisonment. She did however bear to John two more children later on, namely Sarah and Joseph. She went to great lengths to persuade the authorities to release John. When the authorities asked if he would stop preaching, she said “My lord, he dares not leave off preaching as long as he can speak.” One of the authorities said that Bunyan’s doctrine is the doctrine of the devil. Elizabeth responded by saying “My lord, when the righteous Judge shall appear, it will be known that his doctrine is not the doctrine of the devil!”
For twelve years, (1660-1672) Bunyan chose prison and a clear conscience over freedom and a conscience soiled by the agreement not to preach. He could have had freedom at any moment if he just agreed to stop preaching. But both he and his wife Elizabeth were of like mind. He was however sometimes tormented about whether or not he was making the right decision. Bunyan writes “The parting with my wife and poor children hath often been to me in this place as the pulling of the flesh from my bones; and that not only because I am somewhat too fond of these great mercies, but also because I should have often brought to my mind the many hardships, miseries and wants that my poor family was like to meet with should I be taken from them, especially my poor blind child, who lay nearer my heart than all I had besides; O the thoughts of the hardship I thought my Blind one might go under, would break my heart to pieces.” Yet he remained in prison until 1672, when he was released because of the Declaration of Religious Indulgence.
During his imprisonment there were some who were released, but Bunyan was not among them. The local authorities were given their own discretion as to who may be released. Bunyan said that Barabbas was preferred to the master, no wonder therefore that felons were preferred to the disciple. There were times in those twelve years that the Bedford jail was crowded almost beyond its capacity with even saintly men and women who valued the truth of God. There was a considerable congregation within the walls of the prison itself. Bunyan had two familiar friends with him in prison. One was the Bible and other was the Book of Martyrs. Sometimes Bunyan was under cruel and oppressive jailors in an uncomfortable and close prison to which even a jailor took such pity of his rigorous sufferings that he did as the Egyptian jailor did to Joseph, put all care and trust into his hands.
Bunyan, not being one to be idle, took about many things to keep him occupied. He would make laces and other handicraft and acted as spiritual counselor to some who were permitted to bring their affairs to him. He was the spiritual guide to those inside and outside the prison. His pen was his true friend however and spent much time in writing. He said that he depended on no sayings of man, but relied solely on the true sayings of God as found in the Scriptures of truth. He wrote four books before he was thirty-two. His first venture of a literary sort was called “Profitable Meditations.” The book is in the form of poetical dialogue and involves a supposed conversation between Satan and the tempted soul seeing here the first ideas of the parley between Christian and Apollyon. His second book was entitled “Praying in the Spirit.” It was mainly a treatise on prayer. Speaking of what he believed prayer to be he says “A good sense of sin and the wrath of God, and some encouragement from God.” Bunyan’s third book was “Christian Behavior” and was a treatise upon a true life as the fitting outcome of a sound faith. Later Bunyan wrote a book with the title “Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners” which he says is the story of his life. This proved to be one of his most memorable compositions and brings to mind similar works such as Augustine’s confessions. After Bunyan’s release in 1672, he was detained again for a short time in 1675 and it is believed this is when he wrote his most famous piece “Pilgrim’s Progress.” He knew neither Greek nor Hebrew and had no theological degrees. Speaking of the length of time in prison he says “In which condition I have continued with much content through grace. I was made to see that if ever I would suffer rightly I must first pass a sentence of death upon everything which can properly be called a thing of this life, even to reckon myself, my wife, my children, my health, my enjoyments, and all as dead to me and myself as dead to them. And second to live upon God that is invisible. I see the best way to go through suffering is to trust in God through Christ as touching the world to come.”
After Bunyan’s release he immediately was licensed to preach as the pastor of Bedford where he had served through the years. Ten years after his last imprisonment in the middle 1680’s persecution was once again heavy. Meetings were broken in upon and worshippers were taken to prison. Ministers were introduced to their pulpits through trap-doors in the floor or ceiling or through doorways in the walls. Bunyan was once again expecting to be taken away again but God spared him. In August of 1688, he was traveling to London to preach and to help make peace between a man in his church and his alienated father. His mission was successful, but after a trip to an outlying district, he returned to London on horseback through excessive rains. He became sick and had a high fever and on August 31, 1688, at the age of sixty, followed his famous fictional Pilgrim from the “City of Destruction” to the “New Jerusalem.” He is buried in London at Bunhill fields. He preached his last sermon from John 1:13 and his last words from the pulpit were “Live like the children of God, that you may look your Father in the face with comfort another day.”
Bunyan stated that he was a Baptist, but would prefer telling people that he was a Christian and that if God should count him worthy, to be called a Christian, a believer, or other such name which is approved by the Holy Ghost. He continued “And as for those titles of Anabaptists, Independents, Presbyterians, or the like, I conclude that they came neither from Jerusalem, nor Antioch, but rather from hell and Babylon, for they naturally lead to divisions.”
Bunyan was a man who suffered greatly. In summation he early on lost his mother and sister, the quick remarriage of his father, teenage grief, discovering that his first child would be blind for the rest of her life, the spiritual depression and darkness in the early years of his marriage, the death of his first wife leaving him with four small children, twelve years in prison separating himself from friends, family, and church, the ever present stress and uncertainty of persecution, including another short imprisonment, and the final sickness and death being far from those he loved most. All this, not to mention the normal pressures and pains of ministry, marriage, parenting, criticism, and sickness along the way.
All of Bunyan’s sufferings did however have a purpose and was not in vain. It bore much fruit. Bunyan’s sufferings confirmed him in his calling as a writer, especially for the afflicted church. His “Pilgrim’s Progress” is perhaps the world’s bestselling book next to the Bible. It has been translated into over 200 languages. He wrote over fifty eight books. These included collections of poems, children’s literature, allegory, doctrinal expositions of Scripture and those dealing with controversies such as justification and baptism. Bunyan wrote heavily on affliction which can be of great benefit to those of us today who hear the news of cancer or that your child is born with a disease, or persecution arises from being united with Christ. Bunyan’s sufferings also deepened his love for his flock and gave his pastoral labor the fragrance of eternity. He loved his people, he loved the work he did, and he stayed with it and them to the end of his life. His sufferings opened his understanding to the truth that the Christian life is hard and that following Jesus means having the wind in your face. Bunyan said that “it is the will of God, that they that go to heaven should go thither hardly or with difficulty. The righteous shall scarcely be saved. That is, they shall, but yet with great difficulty, that it may be the sweeter.” His sufferings strengthened his assurance that God is sovereign over all the afflictions of His people and will bring them safely home. Bunyan wrote an exposition on I Peter 4:19 where it says “let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful creator.” Bunyan writes “It is not what enemies will, nor what they are resolved upon, but what God will, and what God appoints; that shall be done. No enemy can bring suffering upon a man when the will of God is otherwise, so no man can save himself out of their hands when God will deliver him up for his glory.” Thus God has appointed the persons who will suffer, the time of their suffering, the place of their suffering, and how they will suffer.” Piper remarks that “the key to suffering rightly is to see in all things the hand of a merciful and good and sovereign God and ‘to live upon God that is invisible’.” There really is more of God to be had in times of suffering than at any other time. It is in times of suffering that we seem to grow the most. How little growth there is in our Christian walk when live is smooth. Bunyan’s sufferings deepened in him a confidence in the Bible as the Word of God and a passion for biblical exposition as the key to perseverance. His suffering drove him into the Word and opened the Word to him. As someone who has endured suffering as well, although not near the extent of Bunyan, reading Bunyan has given me a new and revitalized endurance on how to rightly endure suffering, knowing that it does a perfect work.
Everything Bunyan wrote was saturated with the Bible. He said “I have not for these things fished in other men’s writings; my Bible and Concordance are my only library in my writings. Charles Spurgeon said of Bunyan’s writings “this man is a living Bible! Prick him anywhere and you will find that his blood is bibline, the very essence of the Bible flows from him. Bunyan reverenced the Word of God and trembled at the prospect of dishonoring it. Bunyan shows us all what it really means to live upon God that is invisible and to live upon the Word of God. We are to serve and suffer letting the Word of Christ dwell in us richly. How mightily God used this great man.

Bibliography

Brown, John. John Bunyan: His Life, Times, and Work. London: Isbister & Co. Ltd., 1902.

Latourette, Kenneth S. A History of Christianity Volume II “Reformation to the Present.” New York: Harper Collins, 1953.

Piper, John. The Hidden Smile of God. Wheaton: Crossway, 2001.

Categories: Church History

On Kierkegaard

March 2, 2009 A. W. Powers 1 comment

(Guest post: Seth McLaughlin)

In many ways, the life of Soren Aabey Kierkegaard resembles those of the Old Testament prophets. That is not to say that Kierkegaard was in some way directly commissioned by God as the prophets of old. Such a notion is giving far too much credit to the man. But he lived a brief life highlighted by difficulty and hardship brought about by what he understood to be his God given calling in life. He was a lone voice of dissent in a time of optimism and relative comfort. A harbinger of reality and authenticity. And unlike most philosophers and theologians but very much like a prophet, his call was not to change one’s thinking, but one’s life, one’s path. And perhaps that was what was most offensive about him. He demanded action, not reflection. And few, if any, were willing to listen. He was mostly ridiculed and ignored during his life but his understanding of the world and of the human condition would prove all too prophetic as 20th century man encountered war and atrocities and pure evil on a scale never before imagined. Like the prophets, Kierkegaard’s call largely fell on deaf, ridiculing ears and was only appreciated in the clear light of hindsight. And so, it is to this modern prophet that we turn. The hope of this brief account is to highlight the influences and events that shaped Kierkegaard’s life and thought and to then discuss the wide influence within the context of the Church. It is far beyond the scope of this paper and my own scholarly abilities to delve deep into a critique of his philosophical and theological arguments. So, I will rather attempt simply present the facts of who he is and how he has influence and affected Christian thought and seek to avoid philosophical discussions which would distract from his role the in the history of the Church.
Soren Kierkegaard was born into relative wealth in 1813 in Denmark’s capital city, Copenhagen. His father, Michael was a wealthy merchant who had managed to retire by the age of 40. Soren’s mother, Ane, was Michael’s second wife and was the mother of all of his siblings. He was the youngest of 7 siblings and in spite of his short life, he would outlive all but one of his family members, an older brother. He and his father had a very close relationship, both good and bad, and it was this relationship that would be the most defining influence in his life. He inherited not only his father’s wit and intelligence, but also his general depression and bleak outlook on life. He received a top notch education at the School of Civic Virtue, where among other things, he studied Latin and History. He then, in 1830 in what would prove to be an extremely turbulent period in his life, went on to the University of Copenhagen to study theology and philosophy. He would eventually graduate with the modern equivalent of a PhD in 1941. During his student years, Kierkegaard lived a rather pagan city life which was common to those with money and education at that time. The Danish Church, particularly in the city, was on its way to becoming simply a cultural institution and was displaying influence of the rationalistic, liberal thought of the time. As such, though Kierkegaard was a confirmed member of the church, an active Christian life was really not to be expected. However, his journals show that during this period, he was becoming increasingly restless with his life and the aimlessness of it. It was also during his University period that he met Regine Olsen while on vacation in 1837. He would eventually become engaged to her in 1840 but after several attempts, would finally break off the engagement a year later a day after defending his doctoral thesis. His brief engagement also had a profound impact on his life is a telling glimpse into the inner life of Kierkegaard. Additionally, in 1838, Michael Kierkegaard died at the age of 82. Sometime before his death, Michael confided deep personal secrets to his son which only exacerbated the darkness of Kierkegaard’s spirit. His father, and Soren in turn, believed that his sins had cursed his family and that God was punishing the family for Michael’s sin.
In 1841, almost immediately after receiving his degree, Kierkegaard began a career in writing which he continued until his death in 1855. The volume and quality with which he wrote during these 14 years is staggering. In the years 1843-4 alone, he published 12 books. Be it books, personal journals, pamphlets, or articles, he wrote nearly non stop for those 14 years. His writing is often divided into three periods. The first is from ‘41-’46. During this period his most famous works, such as Either/Or, Fear and Trembling, Repetition, and Prefaces among others were published. These are the works that would eventually establish him as one of the most influential philosophers and religious thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries. These works are primarily philosophical in nature and, some more than others, are written to refute Hegel’s rationalist philosophy which was rapidly growing in popularity at the time.
His second period of writing is usually placed from 1846-53. During this period his attention seems to shift from philosophy to the hypocrisy of “Christendom” which he saw in the state church of Denmark. It is believed that this shift, in part, came from his being caricatured by the satirical journal, The Corsair. The Corsair published a series of articles which attacked the appearance, character, and writing of Kierkegaard. At first Soren was hurt and actually toyed with the idea of discontinuing all writing and public interaction and withdrawing to focus on his soul. However, instead of withdrawing, he went on the attack. The attacks by The Corsair only fueled his sense of melancholy and lead him to view himself as a type of martyr. A man of faith who was being persecuted for the truth. And so he spent the next several years, both in books and journals, attacking what he saw as the dead and lifeless faith of the state Christianity around him. He felt that the majority had killed the heart of Christianity to make it fit their comfortable lifestyles. Some of the more notable works from this period are Works of Love, Christian Discourses, and The Sickness unto Death, though many other works were written during this period. It was also during this period of writing, in April of 1848, that Kierkegaard claims to have become a believer. For a long time he had been struggling to become the person he preached and apparently experienced the grace of God and understood the forgiveness of sins for the first time. It seems that he’d always known and appreciated the core tenants of Christianity but had never really allowed it to impact his life in a believing sense. It is as if he knew the truth of Christ, but could not see himself as a part of that.
The third and final period of writing is only a two year period from roughly 1854-55. It is not much different from the second period but during this period his writing more directly attacks the State Church of Denmark than the previous period. Whereas during his second period of authorship he attacked hypocrisy in the Church in a more general sense, in these last years of his life, he focused almost exclusively on the Church of Denmark. Also, he wrote mostly in pamphlet and journal form. He started a journal, The Instant, for the express purpose of writing articles against the church. He also went about passing out shorter pamphlets concerning on the established church throughout the streets of Copenhagen. The impetus for this change was the death of the Bishop of Denmark, Bishop Mynster, and the appointment of his successor, Hans Martensen. Kierkegaard was not necessarily a huge fan of Mynster but, he had known him since childhood and apparently had some measure of respect for him as a leader of the church, part of is tied to his father’s connection to Mynster. Martensen, on the other hand, embodied everything that Kierkegaard saw as corruptive in modern Christianity. He was highly educated in the rationalistic understanding of the day that Soren thought so little of and was also apparently a rather worldly man who enjoyed the comforts and luxuries of life. His appointment to the head of the established State Church only served to cement Kierkegaard’s already built ill will toward all that he saw within established Christendom. The last couple years of his life were focused on little else other than the Danish Church. In the fall of 1855, possibly early October, he collapsed in the streets of Copenhagen and was admitted the hospital. He died on November 11, 1855 from what is assumed to be some kind of lung infection. He was only 43 years old, and a short 14 years from when he first began his writing career. During that short time he wrote roughly 35 books, dozens of articles and pamphlets, and kept a volumous personal journal. Even his death was not without controversy. His cousin was part of a near riot as he protested the Church’s insistence on officiating the funeral in spite of Kierkegaard’s wishes. It was a strangely ironic end to his life in that one could not have a funeral without the State Church’s involvement.
At this point I want to highlight two of the most important influences in the life of Kierkegaard. Hopefully insight into their relationship with Soren will help us gain a better understanding of how he thought and wrote. There is no question that his father, Michael, had the most profound impact on everything Kierkegaard did. One could say that Kierkegaard was really just an extension of his father. He had the wittiness and sharp intellect, but also the glass-half-empty melancholy which defined much of his interaction and writing. His father would allow his youngest son to sit in the room as he and friends would debate the latest issues and philosophies of the day. His father was an incredible debater and would often handily triumph in these debates. It is little wonder then, that Kierkegaard would eventually pursue philosophy and theology and would become known for his airtight way of debating and proving points. It was in fact his father, right before his death, who encouraged Kierkegaard to complete his studies in theology. This leading towards philosophy and theology alone would be worth comment but his father had an even deeper impact than that. There was a darkness of the soul, often described as a deep melancholy, which Soren no doubt inherited from his father. This does not appear to have been a grumpiness or anything of that nature but is more likely what we would now call clinical depression. This was a truly dark outlook on life. Part of it was most certainly genetic but, like much of the things we pattern from our parents, part of this melancholy came from the behavior of his father. And, as if observing his father’s depressive state was not enough, his father shared with a young adult Kierkegaard that he believed the family to be cursed by God due to past sins. The exact nature of those sins is not known but there are some good guesses. It is highly likely that Soren’s mother, his father’s second wife, was pregnant with his oldest brother before they were married. Additionally, its evident that as a child, his father openly cursed God was he was hungry and tired tending sheep. His father felt that he had committed the unpardonable sin and was therefore under the curse of God. Whatever the secret sins were, there is no question that before Michael died, he burdened a relatively young Kierkegaard with what he felt was the family curse of God. It is also clear that Kierkegaard carried this burden with him throughout his short life and apparently found some validity in it. He very much had a love/hate relationship with his father and at times greatly resented the prison within which his father had placed him. For our study of church history, this burden and melancholy or darkness is important to note because it explains much about Soren’s decisions and writing. He struggled to get along with others and had a rather abrasive personality. As such, he always viewed himself as an outsider. A misfit that never really could fit in. It also made him ripe for his sense of martyrdom or persecution that would come later in life. But, his dark soul was not a purely negative thing. It most likely gave him a healthy skepticism about the status quo around him. Nearly everyone took as a given that the established church was how church was done. Yes, the church was Reformed, but it was still bound to the state and was infected with all of the negative associated with that. Along with that, he was instantly skeptical of the optimistic rationalism of Hegel and others which was coming to dominate thought at this time. Once again, almost everyone at the time felt that Hegel had it right. Science was making massive leaps forward, quality of life was dramatically improving for more people than ever before, technology was booming with the Industrial Revolution. The concept that human rationality would eventually make life perfect was not a ridiculous understanding. And yet in the midst of that rush toward human optimism, Kierkegaard wrote extensively against that belief. There is no doubt that his melancholy led him to a skeptical view of the general optimism around him. Were it not for that, he may never have questioned the status quo around him.
Another important figure in the Kierkegaard’s life is Regine Olsen. He met her on vacation in 1837 during his university studies. It is evident from his journaling that she made quite the impression upon him and he eventually grew to love her deeply. He finally shared his love with her and her family in September of 1840 when he made a rather hasty and awkward proposal to her and her father. At first she was put off by his strangeness but he persisted and a few days later, they became engaged to be married. However, only days after the engagement was finalized Kierkegaard felt that he had made a huge mistake. Apparently he’d felt that marriage and romance would help lift him from the deep-seated gloom of his life. His father had died two years prior and so by this time, Kierkegaard was carrying the burden of his father’s confession. He felt that he could not burden her with his curse and the depths of the darkness within him. However, to break an engagement was no small matter and would bring shame on her family so he purposefully tried to be as neglectful as possible in the hope that she would break off the engagement. Yet she had come to love him and felt that she could make a difference in the darkness of his soul. So the more he tried to push her away, the more she attempted to keep them together. Things went on like this for over a year until October of 1841. Kierkegaard actually attempted to break the engagement a couple months prior but Regine and her father had talked him out of it, and he gave the engagement a second chance. However, that second chance was not to last and in October of 1841, a day after defending his thesis and thereby finishing school, he broke off the engagement for good, leaving for Berlin the following day. Now the question is, beyond the obvious pain of a broken engagement, why is Regine an important influence in Kierkegaard’s life and writing? Several reasons really. In spite of his resolution to not marry her, he never really got over her and though he would not directly admit it, it seems that he went out of his way to keep track of her. Yet more profoundly, he came to see his breaking of the engagement as an act of faith. This encounter served as a tangible example from his life that to walk in faith, is a solitary endeavor. The existential individualism that would characterize much of his thought and writing was made tangible by breaking away from Regine. Hypothetically, had he stayed with her, his overall attitude toward life and its individualistic nature would have no doubt been different. Additionally, she would eventually become one more thing that he had sacrificed (think martyrdom) for the sake of following God. That may or may not be true but that is most certainly how he came to view the situation. In fact, much of his writing on the individualism of faith and the leap required has his breaking from Regine in the background. For him, this was his leap into the absurd that we shall discuss more in a moment. Regine and his father Michael were deeply entwined in who Kierkegaard was and how he wrote and thought. Which is not unlike any of us if we are honest. All of us are products of our parents and our circumstances and Kierkegaard was certainly no different. The goal here was simply to provide some, hopefully interesting, insight into where the man’s thoughts and ideas came from. He did not become a revolutionary thinker in a vacuum, but through education and experience. Hopefully these two examples shed some light on the theology and philosophy about to be discussed. Sometimes it is easy to dismiss someone’s thoughts or ideas as crazy when they are just words. But once we see where those thoughts and ideas came from, they become rooted in experience and story and as such, become much harder to dismiss lightly.
Let us now turn our attention to Kierkegaard the thinker, theologian, and writer. The above was very brief in relation to his ideas and theology with the purpose of discussing them as a whole here. To begin, Kierkegaard is often described as the father of existentialism. Existentialism is a philosophical movement that is somewhat difficult to accurately describe, in that it has developed over time and been the product of many different philosophers. The best way to describe the thought is that it is a philosophy of subjectivity. Or another way to put it is that truth must be lived to be true. It is a reaction against rationalism, particularly that of Hegel, which believed that there are absolute truths with are objectively true and can be understood through improved thought and rationality. Existentialism on the other hand holds that there is absolute truth but that that truth manifests itself differently in each individual. Or in other words, it becomes true when it is lived out. This idea of truth being lived by the individual is where Kierkegaard becomes tied to existentialism. He was most likely not much of an existentialist in the pure sense of the word and was a far cry from the secularization it is often associated with now. However, he did believe that truth must be lived out by the person and regularly described this as an authenticity. One could not just talk about God but had to live in light of God. Or one could not just talk about truth but had to live authentically in light of that truth. And in this way, truth was subjective to him. Truth becomes true in an individual life. This is distinct from post-modernism which believes there is no absolute truth, only the truth a group decides to be true. It is not “your truth is your truth and my truth is my truth” but is rather truth is true when it is lived out in practice.
This existentialism of Kierkegaard is important for our study of church history because it has influenced a couple important modern church movements. One of these is neo-orthodoxy which came into being in the first half of the 20th century after WWI. It is associated with the theology of Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, and Paul Tillich (though each of these men differed in many ways). And it is associated with Kierkegaardian existentialism because of its emphasis on the Word of God being the Word of God as it is lived out in the believer. I am no expert on neo-orthodoxy so forgive any misunderstood information in what follows. In essence, Christ is the living Word and living Truth. He is objectively that. But the truth of Christ becomes true in the lives of the believer. It is a lived out truth. And it can come through the record of the Bible but also through other means. Because the living Word cannot be bound to pages and confined to human language that can never really comprehend an infinite God. In this way, the theology is subjective. It demands a practical application. Not all of these theologians were equally influenced by Kierkegaard. But there is no question that he influenced the movement. His dark critique of the optimism of rationalism and humanism suddenly rung true in light of the industrial revolution and the brutality of WWI.
Another modern church movement influenced by Kierkegaard is what is known as the Emergent Church. Like the above, certainly not every church or pastor associated with this movement is directly influenced by Kierkegaard but his legacy is certainly displayed in the movement. There is a great emphasis in the Emergent movement on truth being lived out “authentically” and having a distrust for the established religious institutions that claim to represent objective truth. The movement is most commonly associated with Brian McLaren and his is very subjective in the way that truth is made true. His book, A Generous Orthodoxy, is all about the existentialist nature of our relationship with God and Christ. In the sermons and writings of other emergent leaders, you will encounter the phrase “authentic living” over and over again. This movement is also a reaction against creeds with an emphasis on living out the truths of the Bible, regardless of the creeds you would affirm. Whether they know it or not, that is pure Kierkegaard.
Another aspect of his theology which is important in relation to church history is his theology of the absurd or theology of crisis. According to Kierkegaard, there are three levels or spheres in which man exists when it comes to faith and spirituality. These are the aesthetic, the ethical, and the religious. The aesthetic is the lifestyle of self, of meeting one’s basic desires and that is all. Within the aesthetic, man lives only for himself and no other. The second sphere is the ethical. This is the broad adherence to social norms and customs. It is a higher and more religious sphere of existence since one begins to think about how their behavior affects and influences others. Yet, it is still not true faith because it is rules made by the crowd and does not satisfy any sense of the eternal within us. And, there are certainly things that the ethical will accept which are not necessarily moral in the absolute. Then there is the religion. This is the leap of faith into the absurd. Kierkegaard believed that a leap of faith, beyond reason, is the only way for the individual to join with the eternal. He distinguished between typical religions which believe just in the transcendent eternal and Christianity which claims that the eternal and transcendent became finite and immanent in Christ. That, according to Kierkegaard is the chief paradox among a religion full of paradoxes. He felt that Christianity was full of paradoxes. Therefore, pure rationality could never bring one to a saving faith because there are simply too many things that cannot fit within a purely rational worldview. Kierkegaard felt that God brought men to moments of crisis, where their human efforts and attempts at rationality would break down. It is these moments of crisis where people would have to make leaps of faith into the absurdity of paradoxes that drove his theology. To him, this is what makes a Christian. Will one live in the aesthetic or ethical or will one take the leap of faith in the moment of crisis? His classic description of the paradox and the interplay between the three spheres is in Fear and Trembling where he describes Abraham’s journey to sacrifice Isaac. According to human reason and ethics, Abraham should never have gone to sacrifice Isaac. The aesthetic of selfishness about how he might be viewed or the ethical of it being wrong to sacrifice children should have stopped him. But this was a moment of crisis. Would Abraham follow God or his own path? Would he live in the ethical or the religious? According to Kierkegaard, Abraham took a leap of faith into the absurd and went to that mountain out of faith in God. And, God rewarded Abraham’s faith in a paradox of giving him back the very thing he was asked to sacrifice. To Kierkegaard, this whole story is absurdity, and yet it is the very definition of faith. Such is the nature of Christianity to him.
It is also important to note in relation to the religious sphere that Kierkegaard saw religion as an individualistic thing. The leap of faith cannot be made collectively. This is closely tied with his existentialist subjectivity but there is some distinction worth noting. Kierkegaard felt that to live for God and with Christ in the absurd paradox is inherently a lonely path. Living in such a way won’t make sense to people living in the aesthetic and the ethical spheres. They simply cannot understand and sympathize with living in the religious sphere. But not only that, each individual’s path within the religious sphere will look different and only the individual can ultimately know their calling before God. To return to the above example, only Abraham could know and live out his specific calling to sacrifice his son. It was not Sarah’s calling or Lot’s calling and therefore they could never fully understand it. It was Abraham’s path to walk alone. This individualism is almost so common place in modern Christianity that we really barely think of faith otherwise. However, and this is most definitely not all attributed to Kierkegaard, it was not always so. The idea of a personal faith that is lived out in an individualistic way is a relatively new concept. One that Kierkegaard was instrumental in promoting as a foundation of true faith.
This treatment of the philosophy and theology of Soren Kierkegaard is really only scratching the surface of a deep and rich understanding of faith and life in general. The hope here was to provide a basic understanding of who Kierkegaard was, the things which shaped him, and how he has influenced church history. To really understand Kierkegaard, one needs to read his work. Kierkegaard is a brilliant writer who had a gift for communicating and understanding difficult, deep issues of the human soul. He is often lumped in with all sorts of movements and philosophies, many of which he would be probably be appalled to know he was associated with. One philosophical website listed those influenced by Kierkegaard in the hundreds. His influence ranges from philosophy to theology to psychology to literature. And so, before judging, one must read what he actually had to say. What did he actually think and how did he actually live? That is the way to approach Kierkegaard because that is how he would want to be judged. By his life and the authenticity of what he had to say, not theories. And the reality is, his writing may be as important now as ever. Like a prophet, he was despised during his day and lived mostly a life of isolation because of what he had to say. But his insight proved to be prophetically true in the early 20th century and his words ought to be extremely relevant to our world today. We live in a country where religion and faith is easy. It is convenient and easy to be a follower of Christ. In same places, you are looked down upon if you do not attend church. It is to this context that Kierkegaard writes. Kierkegaard almost understood the cost of faith too well. In his brooding way, he calls all of us to live authentic lives of faith, not to just affirm a few doctrines and attend a church regularly. He is by no means a perfect Christian. He was so individualistic that he never really attended a church and I believe missed the communal nature of faith and there are other points where he was theologically off course. However, the same could be said of anyone. Kierkegaard is simply a must read for the modern American Christian. In an era of convenience and optimism, his sobering call to remember the absurdity and the cost of faith and to live in authentically in light of the truths we profess is a call we should all take to heart.

Bibliography

Alex, Ben, An Authentic Life, Scandinavia Publishing House, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1997.

Kierkegaard, Soren, Fear and Trembling and Book on Adler, from the Everyman Library series,
ed. by George Steiner, Random House, NY, 1994.

Latourette, Kenneth Scott, A History of Christianity, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1975.

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kierkegaard/, edited by William McDonald, copyright of 2006.

Categories: Church History

Remember Pastor Joe Wright…

February 28, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

I think it would do us well to remember pastor Joe Wright’s 1996 prayer for the new sessions in the Kansas House of Representatives:

“Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask Your forgiveness and to seek Your direction and guidance. We know Your Word says, “Woe to those who call evil good,,” but that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values. We confess:

We have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your Word and called it Pluralism.
We have worshipped other gods and called it multiculturalism.
We have endorsed perversion and called it alternative lifestyle.
We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery.
We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare.
We have killed our unborn and called it choice.
We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable.
We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self-esteem.
We have abused power and called it politics.
We have coveted our neighbor’s possessions and called it ambition.
We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression.
We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Search us, Oh God, and know our hearts today; cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Guide and bless these men and women who have been sent to direct us to the center of your will. I ask it in the Name of Your Son, the living Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.

Categories: Church History

Today in History

January 19, 2009 A. W. Powers 1 comment

Today is a big day in history, for two reasons:

1) Today in 1563 the Heidelberg Catechism was first published in Germany by Peter Ursinus and Caspar Olevianus.  The Heidelberg Catechism shortly after was soon accepted by nearly all of the Reformed churches in Europe.  I encourage you all to read it, if would be a worthwhile endeavor.

2) Today in 1568 Miles Coverdale died at 80 years old.  Who was Miles Coverdale?  He was the publisher of the first printed English Bible.  It was Miles who completed the translation of the Old Testament which William Tyndale left unfinished at his death in 1536.  Miles is one of the reasons you hold a Bible in your hands now.

These are two of the reasons why I love history!

Categories: Church History

Calvin 500

January 5, 2009 A. W. Powers Leave a comment

2009 marks the 500th birthday of John Calvin.  There will be much going on this year to honor him and to explore him further.  To keep you posted on everything that will be happening, a blog has been made.  Click here.